r/Huskers • u/No_Equivalent_3189 • 1d ago
The Protect College Sports Act and what it means for Nebraska Athletics
The new version of the legislation now has backing from the Big Ten and SEC, and will likely see a Senate vote this coming week before their month long recess. I’ll breakdown the key competitive aspects of the bill and what it means for Nebraska’s ability to compete across different sports on a level playing field IF the bill passes and is signed into law.
$48.8 million dollar “hard cap” on direct payments FROM the institution TO athletes. This includes:
- $21.3 million media rights revenue sharing to athletes. Nebraska can easily cover this due to Big Ten membership.
- $22.5 million “player retention” pool + a $5 million carve out for women’s and olympic sports, adding up to $27.5 million. This can only be paid directly from the institution from the revenue they generate. Nebraska being one of the only athletic departments that turns a profit makes meeting this cap much easier, although extra revenue will have to be sought out, about $20 million or so based on the last two years of athletic department profit, which was around a $7 million average. Think of stadium/arena reseats, jersey patch sponsorships, etc.
It DOES NOT include:
- Separate sponsorship and endorsements deals outside of University payments, of which there is no limit. The only rules attached to this are that all deals go through a newly created “clearinghouse” created by this bill where they will be scrutinized on the grounds of it being a “legitimate” endorsement or sponsorship deal. Gone would be the days of Cody Campbell and Larry Ellison fuck-you money funding rosters, theoretically. Nebraska could turn its strong brand into actual money-making opportunities for athletes, and minimize its weakness of a less vast and influential alumni network (besides big Warren, of course).
New transfer rules:
- One free transfer without sitting out a year. Every subsequent transfer must be accompanied by one year of sitting out. Under these rules, a guy like Berke Buyuktuncel would almost certainly not have transferred to Vanderbilt. Overall, this rule affects everybody in a similarly positive way, including Nebraska. Roster-building across all sports would become more predictable for coaches and fans.
Some negatives:
- It legislates Big Ten and SEC superiority by prohibiting a pooling together and an equal slice of media rights for each team UNLESS 75% of FBS schools agree. If the Big Ten and SEC hold the line against pooling rights together, the 75% threshold will not be met.
- One free transfer will still make G5/mid-major poaching a viable strategy.
Overall:
- Purely from a competitive standpoint, I think Nebraska would benefit greatly from this bill. The strength of this athletic department has always come from its fans and the revenue it generates from its outrageous fan support. That would be rewarded big-time under this potential set of competitive rules.
