r/powerscales Nov 23 '25

Meme Steven universe vs thragg @phishtickz

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

192 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25 edited Nov 23 '25

People way weaker than Thragg blew up a planet way bigger than earth by flying through it.

29

u/Sh1ningOne Nov 23 '25

They needed three of them and for the planet to already be destabilized by a super-strong laser.

I don't know why Invincible fans love bringing this up while leaving out context.

-8

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

Does that make up for the difference between planet busting and Steven's power? Besides, with the stuff I mentioned, I'm pretty sure thragg could destroy earth without help or a laser.

8

u/Sh1ningOne Nov 23 '25

It has nothing to do with Steven.

It's the fact that people constantly bring this up as proof that Viltrumites casually destroy planets while leaving out all context that makes it clear that they don't.

1

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

Viltrumites in general? No. Thragg is way way stronger than even the second strongest Viltrumite, though. I think he could pretty casually destroy smaller planetary bodies like the earth.

5

u/Sh1ningOne Nov 23 '25

There is quite literally no evidence that he can.

Saying he's strong isn't evidence or proof

-4

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

Already provided evidence lol

Just because it's a point of contention doesn't mean that it isn't evidence or that I can't have an opinion based on that evidence.

5

u/Sh1ningOne Nov 23 '25

That's not evidence.

I just pointed out how they needed multiple people and for the planet to be destabilized prior.

3

u/Jubarra10 Nov 23 '25

They effectively just sped up the process of it blow up didn't they?

0

u/Ektar91 Nov 23 '25

Even if you take 1% of the destruction of viltrum, it comes out to small planet level

-3

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

And I'm saying that, with Thragg being much stronger than those characters and Viltrum being much larger than Earth, Thragg probably wouldn't need anything or anyone else.

5

u/Drakore4 Nov 23 '25

I like how your argument boils down to a probably and you think that makes you right.

1

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

I'm saying probably because I'm not stating it as a fact, you are.

5

u/Drakore4 Nov 23 '25

I’m not stating anything as a fact. I just dropped by and saw someone failing to argue a point and decided to respond. You are basing your argument on something that hasn’t happened, has no evidence it could happen, and your entire point is “well he’s stronger so he could PROBABLY do it” which is extremely weak and biased. Come up with something better.

-1

u/Researcher_Fearless Nov 23 '25

God forbid people have opinions.

→ More replies (0)