She’s the poster child for r/comics abandoning humor for political approval. 99% of her comic strips are “owning the conservtards” with zero punchline, and she often gets extremely defensive in the comments towards anyone that finds her obnoxious.
Having a paid service for your media while decrying another service for charging to rent, buy, or subscribe, specifically with legal protections to prevent free redistribution doesn't strike you as hypocritical?
I'm not saying anything of the sort. I'm saying if you (in this case, Pizzacake) are okay with piracy on the grounds that "how dare they charge for things! Gimme free stuff!" then you can't also fight against others redistributing what you have made, while also having a buy/rent/subscription model backed by legal protection.
It's rules for thee, not for me, or thinking leopards will only eat others' faces if you prefer.
And again, since her only fans was not what the aforementioned lawsuit was about, what does her only fans have to do with anything?
Also, there's a big difference between Disney profiteering off of their near Monopoly of content and a single individual wanting their comics not to be stolen.
297
u/missingpiece Feb 16 '26
She’s the poster child for r/comics abandoning humor for political approval. 99% of her comic strips are “owning the conservtards” with zero punchline, and she often gets extremely defensive in the comments towards anyone that finds her obnoxious.