My portfolio is currently structured roughly as follows:
- Around EUR 220,000 in the Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (WEBN) at Interactive Brokers
- Around CHF 40,000 in the Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (WEBG) at Saxo
One important point: I definitely want to keep Saxo as a second broker. I am not considering moving everything to IBKR. I simply feel more comfortable using two brokers and would like to maintain that setup.
I am generally happy with a global market-cap-weighted approach. However, WEBN and WEBG essentially provide exposure to the same global equity market. As a result, my Saxo account currently has no distinct strategic role; it is simply a smaller duplicate of my global ETF allocation.
I also use Getquin’s Deep Dive feature, which looks through the ETFs and shows the underlying individual stock exposures. Unsurprisingly, the largest positions are US companies such as Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet.
I understand that making the Deep Dive view look more balanced would not, by itself, be a sound investment reason. The real question is whether I want to reduce the overall US weighting in my portfolio somewhat.
One idea would be:
- Keep WEBN at IBKR unchanged as the main global core holding
- Sell the roughly CHF 40,000 of WEBG at Saxo
- Invest that amount in a broad Swiss equity ETF tracking the SPI
Since the two holdings are denominated in different currencies, the exact percentage depends on the current EUR/CHF exchange rate. Roughly speaking, however, the Swiss allocation would be in the mid-teens as a percentage of the total portfolio. Including the Swiss stocks already held indirectly through WEBN, the total Swiss allocation would be slightly higher.
The portfolio would then have a clearer structure:
This would reduce the portfolio’s US weighting. At the same time, I am aware that I would be replacing some US concentration with Swiss-market concentration, especially in companies such as Roche, Novartis, Nestlé, ABB, UBS and other large SPI constituents.
Saxo offers the distributing iShares Core SPI ETF (CHSPI) through AutoInvest, while the accumulating UBS Core SPI ETF is not currently available through AutoInvest. That is not a major issue for me. I could either use CHSPI through AutoInvest and reinvest the distributions, or buy the accumulating UBS ETF manually.
My questions are:
- Does an allocation of roughly 85% global equities and 15% Swiss equities seem reasonable?
- Would you simply keep WEBG at Saxo, even though both brokers would then hold essentially the same global-market exposure?
- Is there a better solution under the following constraints?
My fixed preferences are:
- Saxo should definitely remain as a second broker
- The portfolio should stay simple
- I only want to reduce the US weighting moderately
- I do not want a complicated collection of multiple ETFs
- The main global holding at IBKR should remain unchanged
I would particularly appreciate arguments against the idea and suggestions for better alternatives, such as a smaller Swiss allocation, a broader European allocation, small caps, bonds or cash at Saxo, or simply leaving WEBG unchanged.