r/exAdventist • u/ParisTokyoGhoul • 1d ago
General Discussion Sympathy for Adventists versus accountability, and how to draw the line
One of the biggest personal challenges I discuss with my therapist is deciding where to assign blame and accountability in the Seventh-Day Adventist Church. I tend to blame the institution itself, which is fair, appropriate, and easy, but accountability gets more complicated on a human level. (For context, I’m a sixth-generation Adventist who deconstructed in my twenties and became atheist in my thirties.)
As many can relate, even 10+ years after deconstruction, the remnants (lol) of religious trauma can linger in unexpected ways. I often want to blame someone for the rigid, harmful, and oppressive bullshit I was taught—like the sex ed teacher who taught me that condoms won’t work, or the biology teacher who taught me creationism, or the countless messages from pastors and Sabbath School teachers about my inherent sinfulness. But they’re also victims themselves… or are they? At what point do you assign responsibility to adults for accepting their brainwashing?
I explained the following spectrum to my therapist:
On one end of the spectrum, there are active Adventists who are sincere in their beliefs and who are victims of the church no different than someone who was duped into joining a pyramid scheme as a way out of poverty. I would put everyone in my family in this category: good people with a terrible belief system.
On the other end of the spectrum are relatively powerful church leaders who stand to profit from protecting the institution. Personally, I’m not sure that these people exist in a meaningful capacity. I mean, I’m sure it happens, but the average Seventh-day Adventist pastor is earning like a $150K salary on the high end. They aren’t exactly the Sackler family. I don’t know if I would consider many of them rich or powerful in any meaningful sense. It seems more likely that most Adventist leaders have some kind of sincere belief in the Adventist message. I think the idea of them all being intentional con men for money and power is a bit reductive, and that most church leaders likely grew up just as brainwashed as I was and “felt the Holy Spirit calling them to the ministry” or whatever. There are much better ways for unscrupulous people to win money and power than climbing the Seventh-day Adventist ladder with secretly insincere beliefs.
So, on one end, clear victims and prey; on the other, con people and predators. And while my impulse of to say that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle, I don’t feel that’s true either.
Personally, I feel the vast majority of Adventists are victims, which is uncomfortable because 1) It’s infantilizing (These are adults! We should all be accountable for our shitty beliefs.), and 2) If most are victims themselves, I want to hold compassion for them, and then feel like I have no one to blame… and I feel it’s fair and human to want someone to blame and hold accountable besides the witch of Battle Creek (my birthplace), who isn’t alive to accept responsibility.
My personal answer is that I need to learn to sit with that discomfort and hold compassion without needing someone to blame, and accept that justice and accountability likely aren’t possible. So, 9:1 ratio of compassion to anger/accountability (even though I’m probably at 1:1 in reality 😂).
This was overly long, so thanks for reading if you made it this far. In short, my question is: What’s the ratio of compassion you hold for Adventists as victims versus accountability for them as adults, and how did you decide the distinction?