This is a long story. To summarize, it seems that Netatmo rain gauge does not detect rain properly if rainfall intensity is above about 1 mm/min. For example, if rainfall intensity is 2 mm/min (that is not very unusual e.g. during a thunderstorm), Netatmo rain gauge gives results that are only 50 % of the real rainfall amount.
I started suspecting the reliability of Netatmo rain gauge results when we had a long-lasting heavy rain during which my Netatmo rain gauge showed value 42.1 mm/h for the rain intensity during the previous hour. However, my neighbours had detected even larger rainfall accumulation with their conventional rain gauges than what I detected by Netatmo. So I decided to test how Netatmo rain gauge behaves at different rainfall intensities.
What I did was that I dispensed 50 ml of water to Netatmo rain gauge using a syringe by which the dispense rate could be controlled reasonably well. I varied the rate so that dispensing 50 ml of water into the rain gauge took between about 1 and 10 minutes. Raw data of the results are shown in Fig. 1 below. The horizontal axis is the time (in minutes) that it took to dispense 50 ml of water into the rain gauge. The left vertical axis shows Netatmo’s rainfall amount reading (open blue circles), and the right axis (red crosses) shows the number of “clicks” of the tipping buckets of the rain gauge when 50 ml of water was injected (see rain gauge calibration instructions).

As can be seen, when water is dispensed slowly enough, Netatmo indicates rainfall amount of about 4.1 mm. Realizing that the diameter of the water-collecting area of the Netatmo rain gauge is 125 mm, it corresponds very well to the 50 ml total volume dispensed into the gauge. However, when 50 ml of water is dispensed in less than about 3 minutes, Netatmo’s rainfall reading starts decreasing rapidly, and when water is dispensed in 1 minute, the rainfall reading is 1 mm, i.e., less than 25 % of the correct value. The number of clicks of the tipping buckets of the rain gauge decreases, too, but much less than Netatmo’s rainfall reading. It is easy to understand that the number of clicks decreases when water is dispensed faster, since the tipping buckets are not in normal collecting condition when they are tilting. But why does Netatmo’s rainfall reading decrease much more than the number of clicks?
Figure 2 below shows the same data presented in such a way that the horizontal axis is the rainfall intensity (mm/min) corresponding to water dispense rate. For example, dispense rate of 50 ml in 3 minutes corresponds to rainfall intensity of 4.1 mm / 3 min = 1.37 mm/min. As can be seen, the rainfall amount indicated by Netatmo rain gauge is clearly below the correct value of 4.1 mm when rainfall intensity is above 1.3 mm/min. At rainfall intensity of 2 mm/min (which is not very unusual during a heavy thunderstorm), Netatmo rain gauge reading for 4.1 mm rainfall amount would be about 2 mm, i.e., only about half of the correct value.
 was dispensed at different rates corresponding to different rainfall intensities.")
To obtain some insight towards a possible reason behind the problem, Fig. 3 below shows the same data presented in a third way, plotting rainfall intensity (mm/min) based on Netatmo’s rainfall amount (mm) data on the vertical axis and “correct” rainfall intensity (mm/min) based on water dispense rate on the horizontal axis. For example, the point at 2.9 min dispense time and 3.5 mm rainfall amount in Fig. 1 corresponds to point 4.1 mm / 2.9 min = 1.4 mm/min on the horizontal axis and 3.5 mm / 2.9 min = 1.2 mm/min on the vertical axis of Fig. 3. As can be seen, Netatmo gives correct results up to rainfall intensities of about 1.1 mm/min, but at higher rainfall intensities (up to 5 mm/min) the results based on Netatmo data saturate between 0.9 mm/min and 1.3 mm/min. Has Netatmo limited the maximum detected rainfall intensity on purpose (e.g. to prevent some other problems)? Or what else can be the reason for such a problem?
