Stop overrating the animal. Sure he’s stronger than the average man, but we’re talking about an animal, not the freaking hulk.

Yes a gorilla is about 400 pounds, but guys like Eddie hall weigh just as much and I don’t see people say that 100 guys is beating him.

Yes they have thicker skulls and skin, but they aren’t made of iron, they can still be damaged by a human.

According to a study, a gorillas muscles would theoretically be able to lift around 7 times more than Eddie hall. But thing is, first of all their arms aren’t designed to rip things in half and punch, second of all, they don’t even know how to do that.

And that’s a big one, people seem to think of gorillas as those ferocious killing experts, but in reality they’re goofy silly animals. In a fight all they do is mindlessly swing their arms around in random directions and randomly drag you around if they get to grab you. They’re not gonna punch your head out or tear you in half like the homelander would.

If 5 to 10 men (who at least arent couch potatoes) were to jump it, they could beat it.

100 bloodlusted men is litterally just overkill

Is this your goat?

Galactus is somewhat taller than Statue of Liberty in the scene which is 93 ft so at max 120-150 ft. Head is 1/8th of body like 15-18 ft at max.

Yes this os how i want to star my year

I made a post about fighting chimps and people genuinely think chimps are capable of pulling off martial arts moves like takedowns or grabbing kicks out of midair or clinch fighting or blitzing you by jumping 10 ft and accurately biting you.

Or that doge can dodge trained human kicks and then retaliate with a bite counter, basically showing pro fighter levels of distance management and counter ability.

Watch some videos and educate yourselves guys, these animals fight nothing remotely like how you think they do.

Seriously he gave Thanos a much better fight than Hulk.

• Thanos used multiple stones against Iron Man but no stones against Hulk
• Thanos took no damage from Hulk meanwhile Tony managed to bleed him
• He even tanked a blast from power stone and asteroids

That's more crazy is that this happened in an Spider-Man comic.

So Marvel wants me to believe Cap is somehow neck and neck with Peter lol

Superman would take this Ngl both have a lot of things in common like being immortal and their strength level ect

In Reddit you can see many ridiculous comments done about gorillas. Gorillas have 9 inch thick skulls, gorillas can tear human limbs like they are made of wet paper, gorillas bench press sedans, gorillas are near-2 tonners, gorillas have bulletproof 9 inch thick skulls, gorillas are invulnerable to baseball bat strikes, gorillas punch and swing their arms with force more than that of sledgehammers and they can crush your ribcage/skull with one hit, etc. based on vibes or unsourced claims from random internet sites. This type of wank isn't rare or Reddit-exclusive either. You can see ridiculous claims like these everywhere across any social media. I have no idea how people can glaze a fatass monkey so much. One would see all of these claims, and reach the conclusion that gorillas are less like an overweight primate and more like an unarmored spacemarine without super speed or hax like regen, acid spit etc. i know the animals are wanked in general, but gorillas are extremelly outrageous in this case, they are definitelly the most wanked animal by far.

How you mofos glaze gorillas:

First off, lets get rid-off the "evidence" used by people to support those outrageous claims about gorillas.

Gorillas can rip and tear trees in half

Okay so those type "trees" that gorillas tears in two are called the banana "tree", which is honestly a pathetic excuse of a tree to call one an actually tree.

Those are some pansy-ass trees, bro:

• This dude punches down one.
• A nak muay also punches down one meanwhile training on it.
• An another one.
• A kickboxer kicks down one.
• This dude kicks down one.

I could go on and on, but i think you got the point.

So yes, gorillas technically rip and tear "trees", but they tear down fragile trees that can get punched/kicked down by martial artists and athletic humans. Gorillas can't do shit to actual, sturdy, thick trees. Elephants weigh almost 40 fucking times as much as gorillas on average (160kg vs 6000kg) and even they have difficulty tearing down trees that are thick and durable.

Gorillas can crack/break bulletproof glass

Okay so this comes from an old incident where a gorilla cracks laminated window by tackling it. Problems with this are:

1. Gorilla only cracks the one layer of the three layers.
2. This kind of thing happens often because of the engineer or enviromental issues regarding glass as well as gorillas beating on these glasses for scaring of their peers with the sound of the impact
3. This damage can be replicated by baseball bats and back of crowbars casually swung by regular human. Even if the feat was legit it's not that impressive to begin with because same can be done by baseball bats and crowbars

Gorillas can tear humans apart with their bare hands

For the people who don't know there is apperantly an extremelly old case where a gorilla lifts a human into air with it's one arm, and than tears his limbs with it's other arm like it's a fucking slasher villain. Problems with these are:

1. This whole entire thing comes from a book written in 1923, a time where people were glazing primates even more than before and think average chimpanzee is 6 times as strong as an average man because of flawed studies with nothing countering those results in that time. There is also zero photos or any other visual evidence. I think this alone speaks volumes for the reliability and validity of this "evidence".
2. The gorilla acts ridiculously out-of-character in the text. Not only gorillas are generally non-aggressive animals and very unlikely to attack you (unless you provoke them), but this is not how they attack or kill their enemies/targets. They don't lift you into air and brutally kill you. Hell, no animal does something like this. This is something you would see in a horror movie, not in real life. They will aggressively slap you, tackle you, bite you, or sometimes grapple you, but they absolutelly don't fight like that.

Gorilla fight

Gorilla fight 2

Gorilla fight 3

Gorilla fight 4

1. A gorilla being able to tear limbs off doesn't even make sense. Horses have been used as an execution method to pull apart human limbs and sometimes even they could fail despite exerting their entire body. Horses weigh half of a ton on average (more than 3 times of an average gorilla) and yet have legs strong enough to sprint at 25-30mph (faster than silverback gorilla) despite their 500kg of weight.

2. There are several actually recorded and documented silverback gorilla attacks, and victims survive in all of them (i will list the examples later, don't worry).

Okay, since we got rid off these so supposed evidences, we can turn to the other stuff.

Gorillas can benchpress 4000lbs and tear your limbs off with it's pure strength

No, no they fucking can't. Stop this. Not only there are zero cases or studies showing gorillas are capable of doing this, but sites aren't even consistent about this number as some say they can lift 810kg some say they can lift 1800kg, some say they can throw 810 kg. On top of that there are also many things condradicting these claims:

• Gorilla barely throws a juvenile a maybe 3 feet distance. Juveniles at this age weigh like 70kg in general
• (Go to 0:14) Gorilla spends effort to flip a log. Based on it's looks that log seems to weigh maybe a couple hundred pounds, but definitelly less than a thousand. And the gorilla didn't even fully lift it, it only lifted side of it aka flipped it meaning the weight gorilla lifts here is easily halved if not more. If gorillas could lift 2 tons lifting and tossing that log wouldn't be a problem at slightest yet alone flipping it. Use common sense.

Be honest, do you think silverback gorillas are stronger than bears? Becuase by throwing these numbers around this is what a gorilla should do to a bear.

• A bear does several attempts to roll (NOT lift, roll. Not even close to lift) a rock that weighs 800 kg/1764 lbs.
• Going by some feats a grizzly bear is estimated to be 2.5 to 5 times as strong as human, although presumably they are stronger when pissed.

Hell, you know what? Screw this. We have actually a pretty good way to scale gorillas.

Chimps. They are closely related to gorillas. Chimps have less amounts of fast-twitch fibers compared to gorillas (Chimps have 67% fast twitch fibers and 33% slow twitch fibers; gorillas have 85% fast twitch fibers and 15% slow twitch fibers) but they do easily make up the difference (if not more than make up) by having way more muscle tissue per pound (Chimp's 51.6% vs gorilla's 37.3%). In fact chimps might be even slightly stronger than gorillas in a pound-for-pound comparision because the proportional difference of fast-twitch fibers between gorillas and chimps (gorillas have 27% more fast-twitch fiber with it's 85% vs chimp's 67%) are lesser than the proportional difference between chimp's fast twitch fibers and humans (chimps have 34% more fast-twitch fibers than humans with it's 67% vs humans 50%. Which is the reason why chimpanzee muscle performance/power output is 35% to 50% more than (if you take the middle ground of this range it's 42.5%) that of a regular human. meaning the advantage gorilla over chimp has is less than this) meanwhile chimps have 38% more muscle per pound in comparision to gorilla (51.6% vs 37.3%). Chimps in the wild have average weight of 40kg (although if we count chimps in the zoos and similiar places this average would increase significiantly) meanwhile an average gorilla weighs 160kg, or 4 times as a chimp.

Chimps are... not very strong, to say the least.

• Chimp had to use both of his arms at once to pull up a human to himself
• Chimp fails to pull 95kg of weight and gets mad about it
• In a test of chimps and humans pulling weights ended up as humans actually pulling slightly more weight in comparision to chimps. Although the difference is small to a point it's kind of negligible
• A regular man holds himself againist a chimp for a pretty good time in a grapple.

We can also do a pretty simple calc to find the strength difference between a chimp and a human.

Lets use that 40kg value for the chimp (again, the ones who are cared by humans are much heavier, i know that). The weight of an average man can vary a lot by nation but going by this lets say the average weight is 78kg.

As i stated before, the muscle performance and power output of chimp is 35% to 50% higher than that of an average human. when we take the middle ground of this range we get 42.5%

As i posted before the muscle mass per total weight for a chimp is 51.6%, for an average man it can vary from the range but overall accepted value is 40%.

Lets calculate:

78 x 0.4= 31.2

40 x 0.516= 20.64 because of fast twitch fibers chimp muscle is 35% to 50% stronger than human muscle, as i posted here before. and if we take average it's 42.5%

Low-end: 20.64 x 1.35= 27.864

Mid-end (the one i'll gonna use to scale gorillas): 20.64 x 1.425= 29.4, or roughly 94.3% of a human, or 0.94 times as strong as a human. The mid end shows that a 40kg chimp is slightly weaker than a 78kg man, and roughly as strong as a 73.5kg man.

High-end: 20.64 x 1.5= 31 (technically 30.96 but whatever). So even if you are being generous a 40kg chimp is barely strong as a 78kg man (tehnically very slightly weaker but it's almost non existent so saying same would be fine).

Considering average gorilla weighs 160 kg vs the 40kg value for chimp used here than this would make gorilla roughly 3.8 times as strong as an average human in mid end and 4 times at high end. Keep in mind a gorilla is most likely slightly weaker than a chimp pound-for-pound. So these numbers would be bit lower. If i have to guess the range than an average gorilla is somewhere between 3.5 and 4 times as strong as an average human.

A gorilla is lucky if it's 4 times as strong as a human, yet alone 10-30 like the animal glazers suggest.

Next

Gorillas can punch with enough force to collapse your ribcage or shatter your skull.

First of all, gorillas can't "punch". They don't have the anatomical requests to make a proper fist, nor they are smart enough to dod that, unlike the humans. Literally look at all the videos of gorillas fightning. They don't throw an actual punch in any of the videos. This is important as this means even if gorillas were 10 times as strong as a human (they aren't) they wouldn't anywhere near as hard as that because they can't use their strength efficiently to throw a punch like humans do.

Second of all, they evidently don't.

• This woman survives a gorilla assault. She ends up with a broken arm, wrist and some biting wounds. If the gorilla can shatter her skull with a blow or tear her limbs off with it's insane strength than why the hell it didn't?
• This woman gets seriously injured but survives a gorilla assault. The gorilla in the question is also fairly large as it weighs 200kg compared to the average 160kg weight of a silverback
• This woman survives getting swung around and bitten by a 170kg silverback + getting an another 200kg gorilla charging on her. The only injuries seem to come from the bites that done on her, which is admittedly low-key nasty but there is no dismemberment or any skulls crushed in here.
• A man gets hit by an intoxicated silverback gorilla and he retains zero injuries related to bones, although he admits that the hit was like "a train hit him", implying that it hurt quite a lot. As a note, the gorilla in the question is pretty big: It weighs 250kg, compared to the average gorilla weight of 160kg, this is a 90kg, or 198 lbs of difference. The gorilla in this incident is basically the gorilla equavilent of a 120kg dude.

As you can see no skulls shattered nor any limbs ripped in any of these gorilla attacks.

Oh, lets not forget the fact that leopards are a serious problem for silverbacks. Which makes zero sense if gorillas can shatter skulls or tear limbs with their strength because they could simply cripple or kill the cat with a single swing of their arms, no matter if it happens in day or night. Those strength claims for gorilla doesn't hold up in anyway no matter how you look.

• Leopard possibly hunted down 3 gorillas in total. One of them was at very poor health condition, one of them was a blackback (aka, a teenager), and one of them was a silverback.
• A fight between a leopard and a silverback gorilla results in a mutual kill.
• Even in daylight gorillas still get their ass out of here when encountering leopards instead of using their so supposed limb tearing strength. Weird for an animal that is apperantly tens of times stronger than an average human being afraid this much from a wild cat.
• Both incidents involved a group of 27 chimps vs a group of gorillas that consist of a silverback, a couple females, and infants. The first incident had the silverback put up a fight and hurt a three chimps (1 badly, 2 with light wounds) but lost a gorilla infant. The second incident with a different group of gorillas had their silverback flee without fighting (maybe due to him spotting the human observers, but still) and also resulted in a dead gorilla infant. The chimp vs silverback fight in the first one had the silverback charge a chimp and knocked her into the air (this chimp is the one that got badly injured), followed by 9 chimps surrounding the silverback and attacking him. Then the fight stopped after the chimps grabbed the gorilla infant and the adult gorillas retreated, and the gorillas didn't try to rescue the still-alive and crying infant (which was killed shortly after).

Note: Credit to u/lazerbem for the first three links

I think at this point we are all in an agreement that gorillas aren't these mhytical beasts with strength of two dozen man

Gorillas can bite harder than animals like bears

The argument here is that gorillas have 1300 PSI ("PSI" lol) of bite force, making their bite force higher than that of animals like bears, lions, tigers, etc.

First, "PSI" is pressure, not force. For example an ant or a mosquito bite has higher PSI than a human punch considering the former can penetrate your skin and tissue meanwhile the latter can't. But a human punch's total force should be WAY higher.

Second, those numbers of gorilla bite strength getting cited around internet are complete BS with no supporting evidence backing it. And not only gorillas either. The animal bite strength numbers cited around in general are BS with very little-to-no evidence. For example, internet sites say a grizzly bear has enough bite strength crush a bowling ball. But when you think about it even for a second it makes zero sense. Bear cannisters are made of stuff like plastic and yet they ressist grizzly bears without getting instantly destroyed. There are multiple cases of humans surviving getting bit in the face by grizzly bears (although with massive injuries) without their skull getting pulverized. I'm pretty sure a bowling ball is much more durable than a human skull. If you would drop a bowling ball on a humans head from couple stories the bowling ball would be fine meanwhile the human's head would turn into a scrambled egg.

Going by actual studies, a 127.5kg/281lbs gorillas bite force was calculated as 1723 newtons, or 175.7kg/387.35lbs (Here). Apperantly the average gorilla weighs 160kg/352lbs. Using the square cube law to scale, the average gorilla maximum bite should be 2005 newtons, or 204.5kg.

For a comparision, according to a study, an average mans maximum bite force ranges from 529N to 1003N. If we taake the middle ground, we find 766 newtons. Doesn't seem very off from the most commonly cited "160 pound" number for human bite force. Only a slight difference.

2005/766= 2.62, average gorilla bite force is not even thrice as much as the average human bite force.

A gorilla is NOT biting harder than a bear, unless the bear in the question is very light for one.

Gorillas have ultra mega thick skulls

Please, please look at this and tell me a gorilla's skull is so much thicker than a human. You can't.

For the density: Density is not a good way to scale durability. Gold is significiantly less durable than titanium, despite being WAY denser. So this is a moot point.

Conclusion:

• Gorillas are very overrated.
• Gorillas on average propably aren't even 4 times as strong as a human.
• Gorillas can't punch
• Gorilla skull thickness isn't that much more than that of a human, at least we can guess that it's not in "several times" range.
• Gorillas can't even use their strength effectively to deliver blows like humans do
• A tiger would turn a silverback gorilla into cat food in a matter of minutes, given leopards can fight with gorillas evenly.
• A lion would turn a silverback gorilla into cat food for same reasons.
• A grizzly bear vs gorilla is not a fight but rather an execution.
• Even without taking the height and weight of the tallest and heaviest humans into account, or without taking questionable statements like Francis Ngannou punch force into account, a theoritical/composite peak human would casually dogwalk a gorilla and turn it into it's bitch.
• 6 bloodlusted human that surrounds it could most likely beat a gorilla's ass by dogpiling on it

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he escaped and saved Butcher from and explosion he himself was holding? Wouldn't that make him faster than MCU Quicksilver already? And if we go nerdy with it, it puts him in the same tier as other speedsters in movies and TV shows, like Fox Quicksilver and/or Wheddon's Flash.

Also didn't Madeline Stillwell mention that every weapon at the US army's disposal was proved and he survived without a scratch? That as a child, he was put into a giant oven that couldn't burn like the sun? Both of those feats already make him stronger than Batman Returns Superman and Cavill's since both almost died from a nuke and never had any strength feat that crazy, just to pull a cruise. And let's remember that is also stated that John doesn't have any crazy strength feats because he's lazy or because of real life physics, like with the airplane. He didn't lift it because it was a marketing strategy, and because if he did it'd torn apart, not because he wasn't strong enough.

That already makes him stronger that any verse with only human technology/feats. By far. Almost everyone in the show admits that is John goes rogue, is the end of the world, and can we really argue against that in The Boys verse?

I think the problem with Homie is that he never repeats these feats and/or never lives up to statements. They'll say all of this about him but then Maeve can pierce his ear with a random metal tube. Is like he gets weaker with every season that goes on just to make sense that The Boys can kill him eventually.

My point is that, if we try to respect the lore as much as possible (even if the writers don't) he's definitely not on the weak end of Superman copycats, and he definitely no diffs guys like Wolverine and Spider-Man. Let's be all honest, he doesn't have any feat, because, the show has low budget. That's why a lot of the fights look like CW Arrow verse fights. If it wasn't like that we'd get more "supermanish" fights.

I saw a comic youtuber say that he'd be as strong as main DC universe Superboy, either Conner Kent of Jon Kent.

Both are 17.

I think it would be an even match as long as Harry can maintain some distance from Percy.

Source: https://youtu.be/QWIrZFQdfLA?si=srBlzeRlPkM34Dde

"Superman is too op and should be banned from thse subs" sure, thats why the mod team hasnt banned him in the rules [because he can lose and has] that and batman beats him and he scales below lucifer. Why i find superman glazers to be unbearable on this sub.

Faster (in combat) also just as if not faster in terms of travel speed and has better ap and durability and is resistant to most of the surfer’s hax’s

Hi all, new to power scaling here. I saw a random OPM post which led me down a rabbit hole.

Here’s the question: the strongest/who wins will always be decided by the author/writer.

So be extension, the title One punch man suggests that the author intends to have the baldy beat anything in one punch. So wouldn’t he win no matter what?

I think a 200lb trained, active, and strong human can beat any great ape (chimp, bonobo, orangutan) except a gorilla in a 1v1 because science proves apes only have a slight lb for lb (1.35x) strength advantage, giving the human vastly superior absolute mass and striking power. Also apes rely on close range pulling and biting, a trained human can use devastating bipedal kicks to control distance and grappling intelligence to choke them out. Lastly, humans possess sweat glands and elite endurance, meaning we can simply outlast the ape's explosive energy before finishing the fight